Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 1.009
Filtrar
1.
Ann Ist Super Sanita ; 59(1): 56-67, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36974706

RESUMO

In Italy and Europe, live microorganisms-containing products meant to be used by vulnerable or sick people for preventing or curing a disease are defined as live biotherapeutic products and are regulated as biological drugs. As such, they must undergo extensive quality, safety and efficacy testing and evaluation before receiving a marketing authorization. This review describes the regulatory framework of live biotherapeutic products with special focus on the European Pharmacopoeia monograph 3053 that set mandatory requirements for this kind of medicines, including verification of the number of live microorganisms and absence of certain contamination indicator microorganisms. The other product categories that may contain live microorganisms are also described, with brief references to the overlaps possibly occurring between the different categories.


Assuntos
Produtos Biológicos , Terapia Biológica , Regulamentação Governamental , Humanos , Europa (Continente) , Itália , Produtos Biológicos/normas , Terapia Biológica/normas
2.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 375, 2022 01 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35013500

RESUMO

Faeces Vespertilionis is a commonly used fecal traditional Chinese medicine. Traditionally, it is identified relying only on morphological characters. This poses a serious challenge to the composition analysis accuracy of this complex biological mixture. Thus, for quality control purposes, an accurate and effective method should be provided for taxonomic identification of Faeces Vespertilionis. In this study, 26 samples of Faeces Vespertilionis from ten provinces in China were tested using DNA metabarcoding. Seven operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were detected as belonging to bats. Among them, Hipposideros armiger (Hodgson, 1835) and Rhinolophus ferrumequinum (Schober and Grimmberger, 1997) were the main host sources of Faeces Vespertilionis samples, with average relative abundances of 59.3% and 24.1%, respectively. Biodiversity analysis showed that Diptera and Lepidoptera were the most frequently consumed insects. At the species level, 19 taxa were clearly identified. Overall, our study used DNA metabarcoding to analyze the biological composition of Faeces Vespertilionis, which provides a new idea for the quality control of this special traditional Chinese medicine.


Assuntos
Produtos Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Quirópteros/genética , Código de Barras de DNA Taxonômico , Fezes , Medicina Tradicional Chinesa , Animais , Biodiversidade , Produtos Biológicos/normas , Quirópteros/classificação , Dieta , Dípteros/genética , Lepidópteros/genética , Medicina Tradicional Chinesa/normas , Controle de Qualidade
3.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34864425

RESUMO

Quality control, nutritional value and the monitoring of hazardous residues in honey bee- products have become major topics for both producers and consumers. Due to its potential role in human health, bee-products rich in bioactive compounds are becoming increasingly popular. This review aims to provide an overview of thin-layer chromatography methods used in quality control,authenticity testing and chemical profiling of bee-products in order to help scientists engaged in the field of bee-products chemistry to utilize the advantages of this technique in the detection and elimination of fraudulent practices in bee-product manufacturing. Recently, hyphenation of thin-layer chromatography, image analysis and chemometrics support bee-products analysisbysimultaneousdeterminationofanalytes with different detection principles, identification of individual bioactive compounds as well as structure elucidation of compounds. Highlighted opportunities of thin-layer chromatography could encourage further investigations that would lead to improvements in the detection and elimination of marketing fraudulent practices.


Assuntos
Abelhas/metabolismo , Produtos Biológicos , Cromatografia em Camada Delgada/métodos , Mel , Própole , Animais , Produtos Biológicos/análise , Produtos Biológicos/química , Produtos Biológicos/normas , Mel/análise , Mel/normas , Pólen/química , Própole/análise , Própole/química , Própole/normas , Controle de Qualidade
4.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 128: 105090, 2022 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34863907

RESUMO

Botanical dietary supplement use is widespread and growing, therefore, ensuring the safety of botanical products is a public health priority. This commentary describes the mission and objectives of the Botanical Safety Consortium (BSC) - a public-private partnership aimed at enhancing the toolkit for conducting the safety evaluation of botanicals. This partnership is the result of a Memorandum of Understanding between the US FDA, the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, and the Health and Environmental Sciences Institute. The BSC serves as a global forum for scientists from government, academia, consumer health groups, industry, and non-profit organizations to work collaboratively on adapting and integrating new approach methodologies (NAMs) into routine botanical safety assessments. The objectives of the BSC are to: 1) engage with a group of global stakeholders to leverage scientific safety approaches; 2) establish appropriate levels of chemical characterization for botanicals as complex mixtures; 3) identify pragmatic, fit-for-purpose NAMs to evaluate botanical safety; 4) evaluate the application of these tools via comparison to the currently available safety information on selected botanicals; 5) and integrate these tools into a framework that can facilitate the evaluation of botanicals. Initially, the BSC is focused on oral exposure from dietary supplements, but this scope could be expanded in future phases of work. This commentary provides an overview of the structure, goals, and strategies of this initiative and insights regarding our first objectives, namely the selection and prioritization of botanicals based on putative toxicological properties.


Assuntos
Produtos Biológicos/normas , Qualidade de Produtos para o Consumidor/normas , Suplementos Nutricionais/normas , Preparações de Plantas/normas , Parcerias Público-Privadas/organização & administração , Suplementos Nutricionais/toxicidade , Preparações de Plantas/toxicidade , Plantas Medicinais/toxicidade , Medição de Risco
5.
Drug Discov Today ; 27(1): 65-81, 2022 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34461236

RESUMO

Biological drugs or biopharmaceuticals off patent open a large market for biosimilars and biobetters, follow-on biologics. Biobetters, in particular, are new drugs designed from existing ones with improved properties such as higher selectivity, stability, half-life and/or lower toxicity/immunogenicity. Glycosylation is one of the most used strategies to improve biological drugs, nonetheless bioconjugation is an additional alternative and refers to the covalent attachment of polymers to biological drugs. Extensive research on novel polymers is underway, nonetheless PEGylation is still the best alternative with the longest clinical track record. Innovative trends based on genetic engineering techniques such as fusion proteins and PASylation are also promising. In this review, all these alternatives wereexplored as well as current market trends, legislation and future perspectives.


Assuntos
Produtos Biológicos , Medicamentos Biossimilares , Produtos Biológicos/farmacologia , Produtos Biológicos/normas , Medicamentos Biossimilares/farmacologia , Medicamentos Biossimilares/normas , Tratamento Farmacológico/tendências , Humanos , Engenharia Metabólica/métodos , Engenharia de Proteínas/métodos , Melhoria de Qualidade
6.
Front Immunol ; 12: 744763, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34867967

RESUMO

We report on manufacturing outcomes for 41 autologous polyclonal regulatory T cell (PolyTreg) products for 7 different Phase 1 clinical trials over a 10-year period (2011-2020). Data on patient characteristics, manufacturing parameters, and manufacturing outcomes were collected from manufacturing batch records and entered into a secure database. Overall, 88% (36/41) of PolyTreg products met release criteria and 83% (34/41) of products were successfully infused into patients. Of the 7 not infused, 5 failed release criteria, and 2 were not infused because the patient became ineligible due to a change in clinical status. The median fold expansion over the 14-day manufacturing process was 434.8 -fold (range 29.8-2,232), resulting in a median post-expansion cell count of 1,841 x 106 (range 56.9-16,179 x 106). The main correlate of post-expansion cell number was starting cell number, which positively correlates with absolute circulating Treg cell count. Other parameters, including date of PolyTreg production, patient sex, and patient age did not significantly correlate with fold expansion of Treg during product manufacturing. In conclusion, PolyTreg manufacturing outcomes are consistent across trials and dates of production.


Assuntos
Produtos Biológicos , Terapia Baseada em Transplante de Células e Tecidos , Qualidade de Produtos para o Consumidor , Linfócitos T Reguladores , Produtos Biológicos/normas , Terapia Baseada em Transplante de Células e Tecidos/métodos , Terapia Baseada em Transplante de Células e Tecidos/normas , Qualidade de Produtos para o Consumidor/normas , Humanos , Transplante Autólogo/métodos , Transplante Autólogo/normas
7.
Biologicals ; 74: 24-27, 2021 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34750045

RESUMO

Animal testing has long been integral to the development of biologicals, including vaccines. The use of animals can provide important information on potential toxicity, insights into their mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics and dynamics, physiologic distribution, and potency. However, the use of these same methods is often adopted into the post-licensure phase of the product life cycle for the monitoring of product qualities, such as potency or safety, as part of their routine batch release. The UK National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement, and Reduction of Animals in Research (NC3Rs) and the World Health Organization (WHO) are collaborating on a project to review animal-based testing methods described in WHO manuals, guidelines and recommendations for biologicals to identify where updates can lead to a more harmonised adoption of 3Rs principles (i.e. Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement of animal tests) in batch release testing requirements. An international working group consisting of more than 30 representatives from pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, national control laboratories and regulatory bodies is performing this review. This project aims to address concerns about inconsistencies in the guidance for the scientifically justified use of animal methods required for the post-licensure quality control and batch release testing of biologicals, and the near absence of recommendations for the application of 3Rs principles within the relevant guidelines. Improved adoption of 3Rs principles and non-animal testing strategies will help to reduce the delays and costs associated with product release testing and help support faster access to products by the global communities who need them most urgently.


Assuntos
Produtos Biológicos , Controle de Qualidade , Vacinas , Alternativas aos Testes com Animais , Animais , Produtos Biológicos/normas , Vacinas/normas , Organização Mundial da Saúde
8.
Eur J Pharm Biopharm ; 169: 97-102, 2021 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34597817

RESUMO

Biopharmaceutical product characterization benefits from the quantification and differentiation of unwanted protein aggregates and silicone oil droplets to support risk assessment and control strategies as part of the development. Flow imaging microscopy is successfully applied to differentiate the two impurities in the size range larger than about 5 µm based on their morphological appearance. In our study we applied the combination of oil-immersion flow imaging microscopy and convolutional neural networks to extend the size range below 5 µm. It allowed to differentiate and quantify heat stressed therapeutic monoclonal antibody aggregates from artificially generated silicone oil droplets with misclassification rates of about 10% in the size range between 0.3 and 5 µm. By comparing the misclassifications across the tested size range, particles in the low submicron size range were particularly difficult to differentiate as their morphological appearance becomes very similar.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais/farmacologia , Técnicas de Química Analítica/métodos , Agregados Proteicos , Óleos de Silicone/química , Produtos Biológicos/farmacologia , Produtos Biológicos/normas , Humanos , Imersão , Lipossomos , Aprendizado de Máquina , Microscopia/métodos , Redes Neurais de Computação , Tamanho da Partícula
9.
J Chromatogr A ; 1654: 462445, 2021 Sep 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34407471

RESUMO

Three efficiency tests for single-use AEX chromatography devices have been developed and applied to six capsule formats of a new, salt tolerant, single-use AEX product. All the tests have been designed to be performed with simple equipment and common reagents. By performing each of the three tests on undamaged capsules and capsules intentionally damaged with small defects, in tandem with Phi-X174 challenges in a high-salt buffer, relationships between test results and viral clearance have been obtained. A pre-use pressure-based installation verification test is simply performed during equilibration of the device and effective at identifying gross bypass defects, for example, due to internal seal breakage. Passing outcomes of a post-use installation validation bubble point test are associated with ≥ 5 log reduction value (LRV) of viral clearance. A new, non-destructive, pre-use AEX capacity test involves challenging the device with chloride ions and is orthogonal to the other two tests in that it can detect chemical defects, as well as mechanical ones. Passing outcomes of this test correspond to > 2 LRV viral clearance and provide in situ assurance of the expected AEX dynamic capacity prior to use. Selection of a pair of pre-use and post-use tests can provide robust risk reduction with respect to viral clearance by single-use AEX devices in biopharmaceutical purifications.


Assuntos
Química Farmacêutica , Cromatografia por Troca Iônica , Anticorpos Monoclonais , Produtos Biológicos/normas , Química Farmacêutica/métodos , Vírus/isolamento & purificação
10.
Biotechnol Prog ; 37(6): e3196, 2021 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34309240

RESUMO

With the quality by design (QbD) initiative, regulatory authorities demand a consistent drug quality originating from a well-understood manufacturing process. This study demonstrates the application of a previously published mechanistic chromatography model to the in silico process characterization (PCS) of a monoclonal antibody polishing step. The proposed modeling workflow covered the main tasks of traditional PCS studies following the QbD principles, including criticality assessment of 11 process parameters and establishment of their proven acceptable ranges of operation. Analyzing effects of multi-variate sampling of process parameters on the purification outcome allowed identification of the edge-of-failure. Experimental validation of in silico results demanded approximately 75% less experiments compared to a purely wet-lab based PCS study. Stochastic simulation, considering the measured variances of process parameters and loading material composition, was used to estimate the capability of the process to meet the acceptance criteria for critical quality attributes and key performance indicators. The proposed workflow enables the implementation of digital process twins as QbD tool for improved development of biopharmaceutical manufacturing processes.


Assuntos
Produtos Biológicos , Simulação por Computador , Desenho de Fármacos/métodos , Animais , Anticorpos Monoclonais/análise , Anticorpos Monoclonais/química , Anticorpos Monoclonais/isolamento & purificação , Produtos Biológicos/análise , Produtos Biológicos/química , Produtos Biológicos/isolamento & purificação , Produtos Biológicos/normas , Células CHO , Cromatografia por Troca Iônica , Cricetinae , Cricetulus , Desenvolvimento de Medicamentos
11.
JAMA Netw Open ; 4(6): e2113224, 2021 06 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34110392

RESUMO

Importance: After US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of a new drug, sponsors can submit additional clinical data to obtain supplemental approval for use for new indications. Objective: To characterize pivotal trials supporting recent supplemental new indication approvals of drugs and biologics by the FDA and to compare them with pivotal trials that supported these therapeutics' original indication approvals. Design, Setting, and Participants: This is a cross-sectional study characterizing pivotal trials supporting supplemental indication approvals by the FDA between 2017 and 2019 and pivotal trials that supported these therapeutics' original indication approvals. Data analysis was performed from August to October 2020. Main Outcomes and Measures: Number and design of pivotal trials supporting both supplemental and original indication approvals. Results: From 2017 to 2019, the FDA approved 146 supplemental indications for 107 therapeutics on the basis of 181 pivotal efficacy trials. The median (interquartile range) number of trials per supplemental indication was 1 (1-1). Most trials used either placebo (77 trials [42.5%; 95% CI, 35.6%-49.8%]) or active comparators (65 trials [35.9%; 95% CI, 29.3%-43.1%]), and most of these multigroup trials were randomized (141 trials [99.3%; 95% CI, 96.0%-100.0%]) and double-blinded (106 trials [74.5%; 95% CI, 66.6%-81.0%]); 80 trials (44.2%; 95 CI, 37.2%-51.5%) used clinical outcomes as the primary efficacy end point. There was no difference between oncology therapies and those approved for other therapeutic areas to have supplemental indication approvals be based on at least 2 pivotal trials (11.5% vs 20.6%; difference, 9.1%; 95% CI, 2.9%-21.0%; P = .10). Similarly, there was no difference in use of randomization (98.3% vs 100.0%; difference, 1.7%; 95% CI, 1.6%-5.0%; P = .43) among multigroup trials, although these trials were less likely to be double-blinded (50.8% vs 92.3%; difference, 41.5%; 95% CI, 27.4%-55.5%; P < .001); overall, these trials were less likely to use either placebo or active comparators (64.9% vs 86.7%; difference, 21.8% 95% CI, 9.8%-33.9%; P < .001) or to use clinical outcomes as their primary efficacy end point (27.5% vs 61.1%; difference, 33.6%; 95% CI, 14.1%-40.9%; P < .001) and were longer (median [interquartile range], 17 [6-48] weeks vs 95 [39-146] weeks). Original approvals were more likely than supplemental indication approvals to be based on at least 2 pivotal trials (44.0% [95% CI, 33.7%-42.6%] vs 15.8% [95% CI, 10.7%-22.5%]; difference, 28.2%; 95% CI, 17.6%-39.6%; P < .001) and less likely to be supported by at least 1 trial of 12 months' duration (27.6% [95% CI, 17.9%-35.0%] vs 54.8% [95% CI, 46.7%-62.6%]; difference, 27.2%; 95% CI, 14.5%-37.8%; P < .001). Pivotal trial designs were otherwise not significantly different. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that the number and design of the pivotal trials supporting supplemental indication approvals by the FDA varied across therapeutic areas, with the strength of evidence for cancer indications weaker than that for other indications. There was little difference in the design characteristics of the pivotal trials supporting supplemental indication and original approvals.


Assuntos
Produtos Biológicos/normas , Estudos Clínicos como Assunto/normas , Aprovação de Drogas/métodos , Reposicionamento de Medicamentos/normas , Medicamentos sob Prescrição/normas , Projetos de Pesquisa/normas , United States Food and Drug Administration/normas , Estudos Clínicos como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Projetos de Pesquisa/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration/estatística & dados numéricos
12.
Clin Pharmacol Ther ; 110(6): 1512-1525, 2021 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34057195

RESUMO

We characterized the size of the premarket safety population for 278 small-molecule new molecular entities (NMEs) and 61 new therapeutic biologics (NTBs) approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) between October 1, 2002, and December 31, 2014, evaluating the relationship of premarket safety population size to regulatory characteristics and postmarket safety outcomes. The median size of the safety population was 1,044, and was lower for NTBs than NMEs (median: 920 vs. 1,138, P = 0.04), orphan products than nonorphan products (393 vs. 1,606, P < 0.001), and for products with fast-track designation (617 vs. 1,455, P < 0.001), priority review (630 vs. 1,735, P < 0.001), and accelerated approval (475 vs. 1,164, P < 0.001), than products without that designation. The median number of postmarket safety label updates and issues added to the label were higher with larger premarket exposure among nonorphan products, but not among orphan products. Products with accelerated approval using a surrogate end point had a higher median number of safety issues added to the label than those with full approval, but this did not vary with the size of the safety population; fast-track and priority review were not associated with the number of safety issues added to the label. A smaller safety population size was associated with a longer time to first safety outcome for nonorphan products but not orphan products. For orphan and nonorphan products combined, smaller premarket safety population size is not associated with the number or timing of postmarket safety outcomes, regardless of expedited program participation.


Assuntos
Produtos Biológicos/administração & dosagem , Aprovação de Drogas/métodos , Desenvolvimento de Medicamentos/métodos , Vigilância de Produtos Comercializados/métodos , United States Food and Drug Administration , Produtos Biológicos/normas , Estudos de Coortes , Desenvolvimento de Medicamentos/normas , Humanos , Vigilância de Produtos Comercializados/normas , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , United States Food and Drug Administration/normas
13.
JAMA Netw Open ; 4(5): e2110456, 2021 05 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34003270

RESUMO

Importance: Several studies have estimated the financial inputs for successful drug development. Such analyses do not capture the large investment that patient study participants commit to drug development. Objective: To estimate the volume of patients required to achieve a first US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for a new anticancer drug or biologic therapy. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study included a random sample of prelicense oncology drugs and biologics with a trial site in the United States that were launched into clinical efficacy testing between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2010. Drugs and biologics were identified using ClinicalTrials.gov registration records. Total patient enrollment was captured over an 8-year span, and each intervention was classified based on whether it received FDA approval and was deemed as having intermediate or substantial value according to the American Society of Clinical Oncology Value Framework (ASCO-VF) score. Secondarily, the association between patient numbers and intervention characteristics was tested. Data were analyzed in February 2020. Main Outcomes and Measure: The prespecified primary outcome was the number of patients enrolled in prelicense trials per FDA approval. Results: A total of 120 drugs and biologics were included in our study, with 84 (70.0%) targeted agents, 20 (16.7%) immunotherapies, and 71 (59.2%) novel agents. A total of 13 drugs and biologics (10.8%; 95% CI, 5.3%-16.8%) in our sample gained FDA approval within 8 years, of which 1 (7.7%) was deemed of intermediate value and 3 (23.1%) were deemed of substantial value using ASCO-VF scoring. Overall, 158 810 patients were enrolled in 1335 trials testing these drugs and biologics, 47 913 (30.2%) in trials that led to FDA approval and 110 897 (69.8%) in trials that did not. An estimated 12 217 (95% CI, 7970-22 215) patient study participants contributed to prelicense trials per FDA approval. The estimated number of patients needed to produce a single FDA-approved drug or biologic of intermediate or substantial ASCO-VF clinical value was 39 703 (95% CI, 19 391-177 991). Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this cohort study make visible the substantial patient investment required for prelicense oncology drug development. Such analyses can be used to devise policies that maximize the clinical impact of research on a per-patient basis.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/normas , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Produtos Biológicos/normas , Produtos Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Participação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Autorização Prévia/estatística & dados numéricos , Autorização Prévia/normas , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos de Coortes , Aprovação de Drogas/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration/normas
14.
Pharm Res ; 38(1): 3-7, 2021 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33555493

RESUMO

Biologics are complex pharmaceuticals that include formulated proteins, plasma products, vaccines, cell and gene therapy products, and biological tissues. These products are fragile and typically require cold chain for their delivery and storage. Delivering biologics, while maintaining the cold chain, whether standard (2°C to 8°C) or deepfreeze (as cold as -70°C), requires extensive infrastructure that is expensive to build and maintain. This poses a huge challenge to equitable healthcare delivery, especially during a global pandemic. Even when the infrastructure is in place, breaches of the cold chain are common. Such breaches may damage the product, making therapeutics and vaccines ineffective or even harmful. Rather than strengthening the cold chain through building more infrastructure and imposing more stringent guidelines, we suggest that money and effort are best spent on making the cold chain unnecessary for biologics delivery and storage. To meet this grand challenge in pharmaceutical research, we highlight areas where innovations are needed in the design, formulation and biomanufacturing of biologics, including point-of-care manufacturing and inspection. These technological innovations would rely on fundamental advances in our understanding of biomolecules and cells.


Assuntos
Produtos Biológicos/normas , COVID-19/terapia , Pesquisa Farmacêutica/normas , Refrigeração/normas , Produtos Biológicos/uso terapêutico , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Humanos , Pesquisa Farmacêutica/tendências , Refrigeração/tendências , Vacinas/normas , Vacinas/uso terapêutico
15.
Trends Biotechnol ; 39(9): 866-874, 2021 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33431228

RESUMO

The vaccines industry has not changed appreciably in decades regarding technology, and has struggled to remain viable, with large companies withdrawing from production. Meanwhile, there has been no let-up in outbreaks of viral disease, at a time when the biopharmaceuticals industry is discussing downsizing. The distributed manufacturing model aligns well with this, and the advent of synthetic biology promises much in terms of vaccine design. Biofoundries separate design from manufacturing, a hallmark of modern engineering. Once designed in a biofoundry, digital code can be transferred to a small-scale manufacturing facility close to the point of care, rather than physically transferring cold-chain-dependent vaccine. Thus, biofoundries and distributed manufacturing have the potential to open up a new era of biomanufacturing, one based on digital biology and information systems. This seems a better model for tackling future outbreaks and pandemics.


Assuntos
Indústria Farmacêutica , Biologia Sintética , Vacinas , Produtos Biológicos/normas , Indústria Farmacêutica/tendências , Pandemias , Biologia Sintética/tendências , Vacinas/normas
17.
Eur J Pharm Biopharm ; 158: 123-131, 2021 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33221370

RESUMO

Biopharmaceutical products contain conformational and chemical variants, that are typically well characterized regarding identity and activity. However, little is known about their self-interaction propensity and tendency to unfold, which are critical characteristics for drug stability and safety. This study aimed to separate and compare charge variants of a monoclonal antibody (mAb) and to identify aggregation prone species. We show a semi-preparative cation exchange method, that we developed to separate the individual acidic and basic variants from the naïve mAb. Additionally, we demonstrate, that the yield and purity of the fractionated charge species, extracted by that method, were sufficient for subsequent analysis of aggregate content, conformation stability and self-interaction. Our analysis revealed a differently behaving acidic variant and confirmed its increased aggregation propensity by molecular modeling. During a stability study, the potentially aggregation prone charge variant posed a limited risk to the drug substance (DS). We are the first to look at the stability of single charge variants of biopharmaceuticals, and thus present manufacturers and regulatory authorities with a method to enhance drug safety.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais/isolamento & purificação , Produtos Biológicos/isolamento & purificação , Agregados Proteicos , Anticorpos Monoclonais/química , Anticorpos Monoclonais/metabolismo , Produtos Biológicos/química , Produtos Biológicos/metabolismo , Produtos Biológicos/normas , Resinas de Troca de Cátion , Cromatografia em Gel , Cromatografia por Troca Iônica , Difusão Dinâmica da Luz , Desdobramento de Proteína , Controle de Qualidade
18.
Biotechnol Prog ; 37(3): e3119, 2021 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33373106

RESUMO

Process-related impurities (PRIs) derived from manufacturing process should be minimized in final drug product. ICH Q3A provides a regulatory road map for PRIs but excludes biologic drugs like monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that contain biological PRIs (e.g. host cell proteins and DNA) and low molecular weight (LMW) PRIs (e.g., fermentation media components and downstream chemical reagents). Risks from the former PRIs are typically addressed by routine tests to meet regulatory expectations, while a similar routine-testing strategy is unrealistic and unnecessary for LMW PRIs, and thus a risk-assessment-guided testing strategy is often utilized. In this report, we discuss a safety risk management strategy including categorization, risk assessment, testing strategy, and its integrations with other CMC development activities, as well as downstream clearance potentials. The clearance data from 28 mAbs successfully addressed safety concerns but did not fully reveal the process clearance potentials. Therefore, we carried out studies with 13 commonly seen LMW PRIs in a typical downstream process for mAbs. Generally, Protein A chromatography and cation exchange chromatography operating in bind-and-elute mode showed excellent clearances with greater than 1,000- and 100-fold clearance, respectively. The diafiltration step had better clearance (greater than 100-fold) for the positively and neutrally charged LMW PRIs than for the negatively charged or hydrophobic PRIs. We propose that a typical mAb downstream process provides an overall clearance of 5,000-fold. Additionally, the determined sieving coefficients will facilitate diafiltration process development. This report helps establish effective safety risk management and downstream process design with robust clearance for LMW PRIs.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais , Produtos Biológicos , Biotecnologia , Contaminação de Medicamentos/prevenção & controle , Gestão da Segurança , Anticorpos Monoclonais/análise , Anticorpos Monoclonais/química , Anticorpos Monoclonais/isolamento & purificação , Produtos Biológicos/análise , Produtos Biológicos/química , Produtos Biológicos/isolamento & purificação , Produtos Biológicos/normas , Biotecnologia/métodos , Biotecnologia/normas , Cromatografia Líquida/normas , Filtração/normas , Peso Molecular , Medição de Risco
19.
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev ; 24(1): 30-50, 2021 01 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33308037

RESUMO

One of the factors responsible for lack of reproducible findings may be attributed to the raw material used. To date, there are no apparent studies examining reproducibility using venoms for the development of new toxin-based drugs with respect to regulatory agencies' policies. For this reason, protocols were implemented to produce animal toxins with quality, traceability, and strict compliance with Good Manufacturing Practices. This required validation of the production chain from the arrival of the animal to the vivarium, followed by handling, housing, as well as compliance with respect to extraction, freeze-drying, and, finally, storage protocols, aimed at generating compounds to serve as candidate molecules applicable in clinical trials. Currently, to produce quality snake venoms to support reproductive studies, the Center for the Study of Venoms and Venomous Animals (CEVAP) from São Paulo State University (UNESP), São Paulo, Brazil has 449 microchipped snakes through rigid and standardized operating procedures for safety, health, and welfare of animals. Snakes were frequently subjected to vet clinical examination, anthelmintic, and antiparasitic treatment. Venom milk used to destroy prey was collected from each animal in individual plastic microtubes to avoid contamination and for traceability. In addition, venoms were submitted to microbiological, and biochemical toxicological analyses. It is noteworthy that investigators are responsible for caring, maintaining, and manipulating snakes and ensuring their health in captivity. This review aimed to contribute to the pharmaceutical industry the experimental experience and entire snake venom production chain required to generate quality products for therapeutic human consumption.


Assuntos
Produtos Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Indústria Farmacêutica/normas , Venenos de Serpentes/uso terapêutico , Animais , Produtos Biológicos/normas , Brasil , Desenvolvimento de Medicamentos/legislação & jurisprudência , Desenvolvimento de Medicamentos/normas , Humanos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Serpentes
20.
Trends Biotechnol ; 39(6): 546-549, 2021 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33139073

RESUMO

Most biopharmaceutical formulations use polysorbates: surfactants that are highly efficient but difficult to manage in terms of compositional variability, quality, and stability. Alternatives, such as poloxamers, albumin, and cyclodextrin, are becoming popular and are being explored for their potential to protect biopharmaceuticals against physical and mechanical stresses.


Assuntos
Produtos Biológicos , Composição de Medicamentos , Polissorbatos , Produtos Biológicos/normas , Composição de Medicamentos/tendências , Indústria Farmacêutica/tendências , Polissorbatos/química , Tensoativos/química
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...